Radiometric dating and creation science Sexchat en guatemala
[xxiv] Naturalistic scientists have used many methods to try to figure out when the supernovae created the majority of uranium, and naturalists say “that the results from the various methods used are independently derived, making the age determinations that much more reliable.
The blind spot in evolutionary thinking is the basic assumptions evolutionists make employing each method.
“The widespread emanation of C-free volcanogenic carbon dioxide after the Flood would have further inflated the carbon-14 dates of tree rings in a systematic manner in many parts of the world.”[vii] Naturalists have to assume whether wood remains were near volcanic vents or not.Different radiometric dating methods, on the same materials, often give very different results as evidenced by Mt.Ngauruhoe.[xiv] “The Grand Canyon was once dated at 6 million years, but recently scientists revised the date to 17 million years.A few weeks later, because of a different radiometric dating method using the phosphate mineral called apatite, scientists concluded that the last of the dinosaurs may have wandered around the canyon 65 million years ago.”[xv] “Rock samples brought back from the moon were tested and dated.
Some were only millions of years old, while others were 28 billion years old.”[xvi] “Conflicting radioactive dating results are reported all the time and, on their own, there is no way of knowing what they mean.
We would expect more volcanic activity due to the effects of the flood, naturalists would not expect or account for that.